Re: [windup-dev] RuleModel et al.
So far, an ID and a reference to the Ruleset. The ruleset then would
probably have further info, like, version etc.
https://github.com/OndraZizka/windup/blob/3940b146f811ab6e5fff1cb6c6def71...
Anyway, even if it was just an ID, OOP principles suggest to encapsulate
that ID to a type. My experience agrees. I may be wrong though.
Ondra
On 22.7.2014 02:40, Jess Sightler wrote:
I'm not opposed to this idea... except that I don't know what
a
"RuleModel" would actually contain, other than the ID.
What are you proposing it to contain?
On 07/21/2014 07:03 PM, Ondrej Zizka wrote:
> We should have $subj:
>
> We need to refer to the rules in the report.
> We agreed to store all information in the graph.
> Current ID is not guaranteed to be the same over runs.
> Current ID has no namespaces.
>
> my2c.
> Ondra
>
> _______________________________________________
> windup-dev mailing list
> windup-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/windup-dev
_______________________________________________
windup-dev mailing list
windup-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/windup-dev