Re: [windup-dev] Performance - Forge scanning through Weld

How is this a Windup issue? Robb Greathouse Chief Evangelist Middleware Business Unit JBoss, a Division of Red Hat cellphone 505-507-4906 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Are you saying that Furnace change would be needed? I thought Weld supports Jandex out of the box and transparently. If not, let's keep as a performance reserve. Ondra On 12.9.2014 17:29, Lincoln Baxter, III wrote: I would be happy to see an improvement in the furnace-cdi container to support this, when we have time to work on it. Right now it's not critical, but it would be nice once things settle down after the tech-preview release. On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 8:25 PM, Ondrej Zizka <ozizka(a)redhat.com <mailto:ozizka@redhat.com>> wrote: It seems that Forge spends considerable time (around 10 seconds on my laptop) scanning the classes for annotated types; Somehow related to org.jboss.forge.furnace.container.cdi.impl.ContainerServiceExtension.processRemoteServiceTypes() This repeats for each test in which Forge is involved. Could this scanning be sped up using jandex? If we have 40 tests, then it would buy us over 5 minutes. Ondra _______________________________________________ windup-dev mailing list windup-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:windup-dev@lists.jboss.org> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/windup-dev -- Lincoln Baxter, III http://ocpsoft.org "Simpler is better." _______________________________________________ windup-dev mailing list windup-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/windup-dev _______________________________________________ windup-dev mailing list windup-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/windup-dev _______________________________________________ windup-dev mailing list windup-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/windup-dev