As I was trying to communicate yesterday, I'm not sure why you need another storage location for this when we already have the data stored in the GraphTypeManager :) I *am* open to ideas on this, but I need to see a technical reason to duplicate the info.

On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 3:25 PM, Lincoln Baxter, III <lincolnbaxter@gmail.com> wrote:

Hey Ondra,

The model Metadata is already available via the GraphTypeRegistry/etc. I would recommend that if there is some other view or format that you need for this data, then consider extending the existing API to support your use case - e.g. Return a map view, for example.

~Lincoln

On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Ondrej Zizka <ozizka@redhat.com> wrote:

Hi,

where should I cache intermediate data? E.g. the model metadata.
I expected GraphContext to have some Map-like API, there's none.
Should I add it? Or should I clutter the API with it? Or will it be
better to store it in the graph afterall?

Thanks,
Ondra
_______________________________________________
windup-dev mailing list
windup-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/windup-dev

--
Lincoln Baxter, III
http://ocpsoft.org
"Simpler is better."

--
Lincoln Baxter, III
http://ocpsoft.org
"Simpler is better."