"type" has to be indexed as a "search" field, otherwise our type searches would become inordinately slow. Otherwise, I haven't seen where this is a problem so far. I agree that in the long-run we need to pull this from *Model metadata, though.

On 06/25/2014 02:18 AM, Lincoln Baxter, III wrote:

Let's worry about indexing and performance later, when we know there is a problem. If you want to add a few more indexes for the time being, that's fine, but don't worry about making the index system extendible right now...

I'd focus on getting the groovy rules to work more and support more features, and also work on getting the report generation working.

The indexes are created in:

/org.jboss.windup.graph:windup-graph-impl/src/main/java/org/jboss/windup/graph/GraphContextImpl.java

~Lincoln

On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 9:59 PM, Ondrej Zizka <ozizka@redhat.com> wrote:

Hi,

few things about indexing:

1) We add "archiveEntry" and "type" to the "search" index. Why those two?
2) Should each ruleset and its Model classes have separate index(es)? I
think so - could speed up looking up in different data domains.
3) The docs says the index has to be configured a priori. Where is it
configured?
4) I'll try to make the indexes discovered dynamically from the Model
classes metadata.

Ondra

PS: I don't like non-systemic plural "indices".
_______________________________________________
windup-dev mailing list
windup-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/windup-dev

--
Lincoln Baxter, III
http://ocpsoft.org
"Simpler is better."
_______________________________________________
windup-dev mailing list
windup-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/windup-dev