Re: [windup-dev] Performance - Forge scanning through Weld

Are you saying that Furnace change would be needed? I thought Weld supports Jandex out of the box and transparently. If not, let's keep as a performance reserve.

Ondra

On 12.9.2014 17:29, Lincoln Baxter, III wrote:

> I would be happy to see an improvement in the furnace-cdi container to > support this, when we have time to work on it. Right now it's not critical, > but it would be nice once things settle down after the tech-preview > release.

> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 8:25 PM, Ondrej Zizka < ozizka(a)redhat.com > wrote:

> > It seems that Forge spends considerable time (around 10 seconds on my > > > laptop) scanning the classes for annotated types; > > > Somehow related to > > > org.jboss.forge.furnace.container.cdi.impl.ContainerServiceExtension.processRemoteServiceTypes() >

> > This repeats for each test in which Forge is involved. >

> > Could this scanning be sped up using jandex? If we have 40 tests, then > > > it would buy us over 5 minutes. >

Ondra

> > _______________________________________________ > > > windup-dev mailing list > > > windup-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/windup-dev >

> -- > Lincoln Baxter, III > http://ocpsoft.org > "Simpler is better."

> _______________________________________________ > windup-dev mailing list windup-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/windup-dev

_______________________________________________ windup-dev mailing list windup-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/windup-dev