Re: [windup-dev] Windup terminology question

On 09/18/2014 05:41 PM, Pete Muir wrote: > On 18 Sep 2014, at 21:40, Sande Gilda <sgilda(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > >> On 09/18/2014 03:58 PM, Pete Muir wrote: >>> On 18 Sep 2014, at 19:56, Sande Gilda <sgilda(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >>> >>>> Ondra and I have created a glossary on the Windup Wiki to document >>>> terminology that is used by Windup. The goal is to finalize the correct >>>> terms we want to use in Windup and avoid confusion down the road. >>>> >>>> One of the open issues is whether to describe a "ruleset" (formerly >>>> referred to as "rulebase") as a "Forge add-on" or as a "Windup >>>> plug-in". Does anyone have a preference? >>> I prefer “ruleset” ;-) IOW I don’t think either those are the right >>> description. >> We already decided on ruleset over rulebase, so I'm glad you agree. >> >> How should we describe a ruleset? Won't customers be able to create their >> own? > I would describe a ruleset as a ruleset, or perhaps a “collection rules > packaged as a JAR”? I like it! Thanks! > >>>> The glossary page is located here: >>>> https://github.com/windup/windup/wiki/Glossary. As you come across >>>> other Windup terms, feel free to update the page directly or email/ping >>>> me so that we include them on that page. >>>> >>>> Robb, I included some terms from your presentation and took an educated >>>> guess at the meanings. Please let me know if they are incorrect. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Sande >>>> _______________________________________________ windup-dev mailing list windup-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/windup-dev