patternfly for the UI?

Thanks,
Brad Davis
Director of FSI Solutions, Red Hat
Email: bdavis@redhat.com | c: 980.226.7865 | http://www.redhat.com 

On Jul 1, 2016, at 9:45 PM, Ondrej Zizka <ozizka@redhat.com> wrote:

+1 to getting this straight before getting deep into Windup 3.

To those 4 approaches in the document, I would suggest one more.
Kind of a hybrid.

The point of this, I assume, is to reduce the repetitive patterns in the
chain: graph -> Java Model -> Java service -> DTO -> REST -> JSON -> TS
service -> JS model -> Angular 2.
So we should reuse the information already contained somewhere.

The most frequent scenarios I can forsee are:

1) Query by property, get the resulting objects, optionally with some
nested objects.
2) Start with a set of objects, query some other objects in some
relation to those.
3) Start with one object and get a tree starting with that object, based
on some recursive relation.
4) More complex queries.

I suggest to stick with something simple, so for 4), we could have
custom services.

For 1) 2) 3), we could have a simple "URL to objects" schema, not trying
to be a generic query tool.
It could reuse the Models.
Examples (made up):
1) /graph/File{path=...}!out:fileToProject,getClassifications,:...     
-- File objects with given properties with objects from relations
defined behind ! attached to it.
2) /graph/Project/id=[1,2,3]/out:projectToFile/{path=...}
3a) /graph/Project/id=1//in:parent!out:fileToProject -- will query
what's under that relation
3b) /graph/Project/id=1//in:parent!getProjects  -- will use the method
to attach the objects.

Maybe it's quite similar to what's proposed in the doc under 4, only a
bit more type oriented, and also more use-case oriented and less generic.

my2c.
Ondra


On 1.7.2016 23:28, Jess Sightler wrote:
I don't think we ever discussed this in the Thursday meeting. My mic
problems probably didn't help with that (sorry about that). I have
started a document to discuss a few different approaches to building
REST services for the web application.

Keep in mind the following high level requirements:

  - Support querying of data easily for both the global configuration
graph (eg, projects, groups etc) as well as for the individual graphs

  - Support persisting new data to the graph for the configuration graph

  - Support easy marshalling to/from ECMAScript objects


I have added these to the document as well:

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jJz-NuTI00A7VcP7K58Gv6sWGyC8CuMsc5MVldRrc6Y/edit#heading=h.9hob5uguvtqc


Feel free to add your thoughts as well.


Thanks,

Jess



On 06/26/2016 07:26 PM, Ondrej Zizka wrote:
Hi devs,

How about creating a layer that would query the graph based on a REST URL?
I.e. instead of creating a REST endpoint for each service, we could do
something like

localhost//windup/rest/graph/ProjectModel/id-48984/out-projectTofile/with-...

Or some subset of Gremlin perhaps...
Just an idea.

Ondra
_______________________________________________
windup-dev mailing list
windup-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/windup-dev
_______________________________________________
windup-dev mailing list
windup-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/windup-dev

_______________________________________________
windup-dev mailing list
windup-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/windup-dev