Yeah, everything is iterated over, even if there is only a single result. The problem here is that for some reason no result frames are being passed to the operations. Not so much an architectural issue, rather a bug.

On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Brad Davis <bdavis@redhat.com> wrote:
I think maybe the processor itself would be aware of whether it should be iterative or single.  For example, Classification should know "I may get a set of results, but I only need one result to properly classify this resource".  While, Hints should know "If I get a set of results, I should add it to each one."

That is my thought anyway.

Brad Davis
Senior Manager, Red Hat Consulting
Email: bdavis@redhat.com | c: 980.226.7865 | http://www.redhat.com


----- Original Message -----
From: "Lincoln Baxter, III" <lincolnbaxter@gmail.com>
To: "Matej Briskar" <mbriskar@redhat.com>, "Windup-dev List" <windup-dev@lists.jboss.org>
Sent: Tuesday, December 9, 2014 11:50:58 PM
Subject: [windup-dev] Problems with XML



Matej,

This XML is repeated in almost all the rules we have so far...

<perform>
<iteration>
<hint .... >
</iteration>
</perform>

This XML mayactually be creating a nested iteration over no elements. One iteration created by default in the <perform> method, the next one by the subsequent <iteration>...

Iteration is implied if omitted, so this may be the problem, not sure.
I am going to look into this more tomorrow. But if you get to it before I do, this may be a place to start looking. Try removing the <iteration> tags and putting the child nodes into <perform> directly.

--
Lincoln Baxter, III
http://ocpsoft.org
"Simpler is better."

_______________________________________________
windup-dev mailing list
windup-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/windup-dev
_______________________________________________
windup-dev mailing list
windup-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/windup-dev



--
Lincoln Baxter, III
http://ocpsoft.org
"Simpler is better."