Because this type of thing leaks into the public API with
Tinkerpop/Titan, I would prefer to merge something like this earlier
rather than later. Otherwise it involves more refactoring down the road.
Your previous email said this:
"1) A reference to the rule being executed could be made accessible from
a context.
2) Some layer above Frames could catch any creation/alteration of
vertices and link them.
Haven't seen Frames guts, perhaps not doable easily at the moment."
If that wasn't talking about event handling, I don't know what it was
talking about. :)
On 08/12/2014 01:16 AM, Ondrej Zizka wrote:
I'm not sure I was specifically interested in events, I'd use
those for
a long-running multi-user app, but for Windup...
But maybe I was, let me think... :)
Either way, what I ment was - do we need them now? AKA, do we use them?
Thanks,
Ondra
On 11.8.2014 16:42, Jess Sightler wrote:
> You seemed pretty interested in them a while back (when you were talking
> about RuleModel, etc). :)
>
> On 08/11/2014 02:05 AM, Ondrej Zizka wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> what do we need EventGraph for?
>>
>> GraphContextImpl.java:
>>
>> this.titanGraph = TitanFactory.open(conf);
>> this.eventGraph = new EventGraph<TitanGraph>(this.titanGraph);
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Ondra
>> _______________________________________________
>> windup-dev mailing list
>> windup-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/windup-dev
> _______________________________________________
> windup-dev mailing list
> windup-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/windup-dev
_______________________________________________
windup-dev mailing list
windup-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/windup-dev