I guess in principle I'm fine with forking Tattletale into our repo, and
publishing it under a different artifact, but in reality, I don't know that
it's at all useful. I think we might better spend our time figuring out why
people want it (if they want it) and then deciding if it's worth
maintaining it.
Do we have any users that actually use this feature? Robb, why did you want
Tattletale? Marc? Brad? Tobias? Thoughts?
~Lincoln
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 2:04 AM, Marek Novotny <mnovotny(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Hi windup devs,
I asked Jesper what is the plan with tattletale and below is his response.
I think we probably need replace the features by merging it into our
codebase or just fork tattletale as its future is stalled and that means
our fork won't need updates from upstream/original tattletale stream.
Are you fine with that? I am asking due this related issue
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WINDUP-699, but there will be probably
more reasons, list your own if you have any ;)
-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Re: Tattletale future?
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 10:39:07 -0400
From: Jesper Pedersen <jpederse(a)redhat.com>
Organization: JBoss, by Red Hat
To: mnovotny(a)redhat.com
Hi,
On 07/22/2015 10:30 AM, Marek Novotny wrote:
> I was looking in Tattletale github repository and it seems it is a long
> time from the last commit
Project has been dead for 3 years now.
> and PRs are were waiting in a queue.
>
Likely because they are incomplete or wrong - but whatever works for
people. I'm not spending time on it though.
> What's the plan for Tattletale project?
>
There are no plans to activate the project again.
Best regards,
Jesper
_______________________________________________
windup-dev mailing list
windup-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/windup-dev
--
Lincoln Baxter, III
http://ocpsoft.org
"Simpler is better."