All right I didn't read the whole thread... sorry for the noise ;)
On 4.5.2016 21:56, Jess Sightler wrote:
Yes. That was the entire point of this move after all. :)
On 05/04/2016 03:55 PM, Ondrej Zizka wrote:
> Could this be outside windup/windup repo? It makes the build take longer.
>
> Ondra
>
>
> On 29.4.2016 15:30, Jess Sightler wrote:
>> Sort of. The code is all directly from the upstream repo (with history).
>> The pom is a slightly modified version of the one we have in
>> windup/forks/fernflower.
>>
>> On 04/29/2016 03:58 AM, Marek Novotny wrote:
>>> Just to confirm for myself, that is based on what we have here
>>>
https://github.com/windup/windup/tree/master/forks/fernflower, right?
>>>
>>> On 28.4.2016 23:23, Jess Sightler wrote:
>>>> I have created a new project within Windup for maintaining a fork of
>>>> Fernflower with Java 7 compatibility and a Maven pom. Maybe we can start
>>>> releasing and keeping this up to date separately from windup core?
>>>>
>>>> It is here:
>>>>
https://github.com/windup/windup-fernflower
>>>>
>>>> I think we can switch Windup to use this as part of 2.6.0, if noone
>>>> objects to that.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> windup-dev mailing list
>>>> windup-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/windup-dev
>>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> windup-dev mailing list
>> windup-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/windup-dev
> _______________________________________________
> windup-dev mailing list
> windup-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/windup-dev
_______________________________________________
windup-dev mailing list
windup-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/windup-dev