Subquestions: Do we want to / can we restrict the Groovy DSL syntax anyhow? Will we aim for alternative XML-based rules which would translate to the API? On 25.7.2014 19:26, Ondrej Zizka wrote: > Hi, > > is there a reason against querying the graph, storing it to Java > variable, iterating it using for( Foo foo : foos ), and skipping the > varstack and when() etc? > Basically, the current rules structure is appropriate for e.g. XML based > rules whose XSD would translate to this structure, but if we provide > Java and Groovy, the above way would be shorter to write, and users > might tend to do that. > > Thanks, > Ondra > _______________________________________________ > windup-dev mailing list > windup-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/windup-dev _______________________________________________ windup-dev mailing list windup-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/windup-dev