I'm not sure how that would work with the stream-based regex solution
that we are using?
On 05/04/2016 10:58 PM, Ondrej Zizka wrote:
Instead of scanning the files with every new rule with
<filematches>, we
could collect the patterns upfront and then iterate over all files and
try all the patterns whose filename pattern matches for that file.
The idea is that the system could keep this file cached / open for all
passes.
WDYT? And aren't we already doing it? (I didn't check)
Ondra
_______________________________________________
windup-dev mailing list
windup-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/windup-dev