[aerogear-dev] [OTP] Mobile-OTP / OTP for .NET
Daniel Manzke
daniel.manzke at googlemail.com
Mon Dec 17 08:21:29 EST 2012
Here we go:
Clock c = new Clock();
while(true){
System.out.println(c.getCurrentInterval());
Thread.sleep(1000);
}
c.getCurrentInterval() is always the same :)
2012/12/17 Bruno Oliveira <bruno at abstractj.org>
> Hey my friend, welcome! Answers inline.
>
>
> --
> "The measure of a man is what he does with power" - Plato
> -
> @abstractj
> -
> Volenti Nihil Difficile
>
>
>
> On Sunday, December 16, 2012 at 8:27 PM, Daniel Manzke wrote:
>
> > Hey guys,
> >
> > after 140 chars were not enough for matthias and bruno I decided to
> subscribe to the list. ;)
> >
> > 1:
> > After working through aerogear-otp-java I took some hours to port it
> .NET. If you are interested I would like to contribute it after cleanup.
> >
> > Are you interested? :)
> I'm completely dumb on .net platform. Is it (
> https://github.com/manzke/aerogear-otp-dotnet) compatible with windows
> phone?
> >
> > 2:
> > Due to the fact that we are using Mobile-OTP in hour company I also took
> some time and have implemented it.
> > PoC is working.
> > Pull-Request will be submitted if ready.
> >
> >
> > Question: I saw that the Clock-Implementation is returning a static
> value for current time. So the token will be the same every time we call
> Totp.now().
> Not really, do you have some scenario or unit test to reproduce it? The
> token will be the same during 30s only.
> >
> > Is it really what developers are expecting?
>
> No, I'd appreciate if you gist the sources to reproduce it, then we can
> find out what's wrong.
> >
> > If I call now, I expect the time it was called not created. :)
> >
> > Why not just use System.currentMilliSeconds()? It is UTC. ;)
> I wouldn't like to trust in Java while we're dealing with timezones.
> System.currentMilliSeconds also works np on changing it, if the unit tests
> are passing.
> >
> >
> > Bye,
> > Daniel
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > aerogear-dev mailing list
> > aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org (mailto:aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org)
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
--
Viele Grüße/Best Regards
Daniel Manzke
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20121217/58cab721/attachment.html
More information about the aerogear-dev
mailing list