[aerogear-dev] [aerogear-controller] Configuration

Daniel Bevenius daniel.bevenius at gmail.com
Thu Nov 15 00:33:07 EST 2012


>Dan, for all effects this forum is dead for good :)
Not completely dead yet, there was one reply in favour of CDI ;)




On 14 November 2012 18:00, Douglas Campos <qmx at qmx.me> wrote:

> Dan, for all effects this forum is dead for good :)
>
> This ML is our forum :)
>
> On Nov 14, 2012, at 11:44 AM, Daniel Bevenius wrote:
>
> > I've asked this in the user forum too:
> > https://community.jboss.org/thread/213370?tstart=0
> >
> >
> > On 14 November 2012 14:33, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org>
> wrote:
> > there is pros and cons in both (think spring (java config VS verbose xml)
> >
> > I guess if we keep it minimal a xml file is fine...
> >
> > -M
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Daniel Bevenius
> > <daniel.bevenius at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Thanks for the feedback guys!
> > > Going to wait a little longer so everyone who wants to can have a say.
> > >
> > >
> > > On 14 November 2012 14:16, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hi firends,
> > >> My preference goes for XML config. CORS is more a "external" config
> aspect
> > >> rather than being part of the "domain/core".
> > >> Seb
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno at abstractj.org
> >
> > >> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> Hi my friend, at first glance looks like the XML option is more
> readable.
> > >>>
> > >>> But before we move forward I'd like to hear more opinions about it.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> --
> > >>> "The measure of a man is what he does with power" - Plato
> > >>> -
> > >>> @abstractj
> > >>> -
> > >>> Volenti Nihil Difficile
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> On Tuesday, November 13, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Daniel Bevenius wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> > To help clarify the options here the following gist contains
> examples
> > >>> > of the two suggestions provided so far:
> > >>> > https://gist.github.com/4066691
> > >>> >
> > >>> >
> > >>> >
> > >>> >
> > >>> > On 13 November 2012 16:49, Daniel Bevenius <
> daniel.bevenius at gmail.com
> > >>> > (mailto:daniel.bevenius at gmail.com)> wrote:
> > >>> > > > i dislike xml configuration files, so i would vote for an
> > >>> > > > Annotation.
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > Yeah, I agree and we are avoiding any xml right now.
> > >>> > > So, how about we provide some hopefully good defaults for CORS
> and
> > >>> > > then users can provide there own @Producer. We will provide at
> builder api
> > >>> > > to create the config instance so it won't be a lot of work for
> users.
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > Should CORS be enabled by default?
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > On 13 November 2012 13:35, Lucas Holmquist <lholmqui at redhat.com
> > >>> > > (mailto:lholmqui at redhat.com)> wrote:
> > >>> > > >
> > >>> > > > On Nov 13, 2012, at 4:18 AM, Daniel Bevenius
> > >>> > > > <daniel.bevenius at gmail.com (mailto:daniel.bevenius at gmail.com)>
> wrote:
> > >>> > > > > I'm working on adding CORS support there are several things
> that
> > >>> > > > > can be configured in this case. Below is an example of the
> options that are
> > >>> > > > > currently available:
> > >>> > > > > public interface CorsConfiguration {
> > >>> > > > > public abstract boolean isCorsSupportEnabled();
> > >>> > > > > public abstract boolean exposeHeaders();
> > >>> > > > > public abstract String getExposeHeaders();
> > >>> > > > > public abstract boolean anyOrigin();
> > >>> > > > > public abstract boolean allowCookies();
> > >>> > > > > public abstract boolean hasMaxAge();
> > >>> > > > > public abstract long getMaxAge();
> > >>> > > > > public abstract Set<String> getValidRequestMethods();
> > >>> > > > > public abstract Set<String> getValidRequestHeaders();
> > >>> > > > > }
> > >>> > > > > How do we want users to configure these configuration
> options?
> > >>> > > > > Using a CDI annotation with "sensible" default values or
> specify them in
> > >>> > > > > web.xml (http://web.xml)?
> > >>> > > >
> > >>> > > >
> > >>> > > > i dislike xml configuration files, so i would vote for an
> > >>> > > > Annotation. but thats personal preference
> > >>> > > >
> > >>> > > >
> > >>> > > > > cheers,
> > >>> > > > > /Dan
> > >>> > > > >
> > >>> > > > >
> > >>> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > >>> > > > > aerogear-dev mailing list
> > >>> > > > > aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > >>> > > > > (mailto:aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org)
> > >>> > > > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> > >>> > > >
> > >>> > > >
> > >>> > > >
> > >>> > > > _______________________________________________
> > >>> > > > aerogear-dev mailing list
> > >>> > > > aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org (mailto:
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org)
> > >>> > > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> > >>> > >
> > >>> >
> > >>> >
> > >>> > _______________________________________________
> > >>> > aerogear-dev mailing list
> > >>> > aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org (mailto:aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org)
> > >>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> _______________________________________________
> > >>> aerogear-dev mailing list
> > >>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> aerogear-dev mailing list
> > >> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > aerogear-dev mailing list
> > > aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> >
> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> > _______________________________________________
> > aerogear-dev mailing list
> > aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > aerogear-dev mailing list
> > aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
> -- qmx
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20121115/f1973f26/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the aerogear-dev mailing list