[aerogear-dev] UnifiedPush overview image

[Hylke Bons]

Yes, my bad. That's fixed now.

Hylke


On 12/08/2013 20:45, Yavuz Selim YILMAZ wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have two "2"s and no "4"s on that nice looking image. Is that 
> intentional? (considering the numbers show the action flow, having "4" 
> makes more sense to me).
>
> Kind regards,
>
> ---
> Yavuz Selim Yilmaz
> SUNY at Buffalo
> Computer Science and Engineering
> PhD Candidate
>
> On Aug 12, 2013, at 3:39 PM, Kris Borchers <kris at redhat.com 
> <mailto:kris at redhat.com>> wrote:
>
>> I also like it. One request/question. Would it be possible and not 
>> confusing to split the JS image to also show desktop? I'm thinking 
>> split the image on a diagonal from bottom left to top right so that 
>> upper left side of image is the top portion of a mobile device and 
>> bottom right portion of image is the bottom of a monitor and partial 
>> keyboard? I just think it would be cool to show it would work on both 
>> somehow in one image.
>>
>> On Aug 12, 2013, at 2:36 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org 
>> <mailto:matzew at apache.org>> wrote:
>>
>>> I personally like it
>>>
>>> On Monday, August 12, 2013, Hylke Bons wrote:
>>>
>>>     https://raw.github.com/hbons/aerogear-design/master/aerogear_unified_push_server.png
>>>     How's that?
>>>
>>>     Hylke
>>>
>>>     On 12/08/2013 14:12, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>>>>     Luke's UI is already using the latest wording, so I am not sure
>>>>     besides the overview graphic if there are much changes really
>>>>     needed
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Hylke Bons <hbons at redhat.com
>>>>     <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'hbons at redhat.com');>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>         Sure. Sounds like an improvement to me. I guess we need
>>>>         this updated in the wireframes and implementation as well then?
>>>>
>>>>         Hylke
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         On 08/08/2013 13:43, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>>>>
>>>>             Hi Hylke,
>>>>
>>>>             can we get an update on this image:
>>>>             http://staging.aerogear.org/docs/specs/aerogear-server-push/aerogear_unified_push_server.png
>>>>
>>>>             * the "Mobile Variant Instances" are now named
>>>>             "Installations"
>>>>             * there is no device representing a SimplePush client
>>>>
>>>>             I guess I should file a JIRA :-)
>>>>
>>>>             -- 
>>>>             Matthias Wessendorf
>>>>
>>>>             blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>>>             sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>>>             twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     -- 
>>>>     Matthias Wessendorf
>>>>
>>>>     blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>>>     sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>>>     twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>>
>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20130813/ef4b54df/attachment.html