[aerogear-dev] AeroGear Build and Dependency Management

[Bruno Oliveira]

I think that's a great idea. +1

Kris Borchers wrote:
> As AeroGear.js gets larger and more complex, it makes sense to revisit
> our build strategy as well as our dependency management strategy since
> that affects the build.
> 
> I was thinking, and after discussing with Luke I believe he agrees, that
> we should investigate the use of AMD (Asynchronous Module Definition).
> What this provides for us is:
> 
>  1. Better modularization between the pieces of code in AeroGear.js
>  2. Better dependency management by specifically defining those
>     dependencies in each module
>  3. A better base for our custom build process
> 
> 
> I think all of those reasons point to the need for this implementation.
> That being said, it doesn't come without a cost. We would need to
> reorganize the repo and modify each file to make it a proper AMD module.
> This will take time but I think it is time well spent.
> 
> I would be glad to hear if anyone has any thoughts or concerns around this.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

-- 
abstractj


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 495 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20130820/980916af/attachment.bin