[aerogear-dev] AeroGear Build and Dependency Management
Kris Borchers
kborcher at redhat.com
Tue Aug 20 17:17:00 EDT 2013
On Aug 20, 2013, at 16:03, Douglas Campos <qmx at qmx.me> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 11:15:05AM -0500, Kris Borchers wrote:
>> I would be glad to hear if anyone has any thoughts or concerns around
>> this.
> So for me as an end user nothing changes right?
Like I said to Summers, only if they want it to. Everything can stay the same or if they want to do the AMD thing as part of their process that's fine too.
>
> --
> qmx
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
More information about the aerogear-dev
mailing list