[aerogear-dev] how about this API for sync?

[Daniel Bevenius]

>One of my concerns with Couch is it is another application/server/dependency
to package and keep up with.
The suggestion is that we do something similar to CouchDB and perhaps lend
some ideas from their protocol and how they handle conflicts. Not that we
base this on CouchDB, sorry if this was confusing.
A server implementation might start off delegating to a CouchDB instance
just to get up and running. This way our client libs would have something
work against.






On 11 December 2013 15:47, Summers Pittman <supittma at redhat.com> wrote:

> On 12/11/2013 04:44 AM, Bruno Oliveira wrote:
> > Very very very simple with CounchDB +4242424242
> >
> One of my concerns with Couch is it is another
> application/server/dependency to package and keep up with.
>
> Of course if we want to build an aerogear-sync-server application
> instead of an aerogear-sync-sererver spec that servers can implement it
> makes a lot more sense.
>
> Can CouchDB be embedded in a Java EE application?
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20131211/57691ad3/attachment.html