[aerogear-dev] AngularJS/Backbone discussion

[Pete Muir]

Blergh, suite is the wrong word, so please don't repeat it. I need to check for the right word :-)

On 11 Feb 2013, at 12:32, Kris Borchers wrote:

> OK, I think that makes sense to me. Anyone else want to chime in?
> 
> On Feb 11, 2013, at 6:30 AM, Pete Muir <pmuir at redhat.com> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On 11 Feb 2013, at 12:27, Kris Borchers wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> On Feb 11, 2013, at 5:48 AM, Pete Muir <pmuir at redhat.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Kris/Douglas,
>>>> 
>>>> I also realised there might be another point of confusion in this discussion. I'm definitely not proposing a strategy that Aerogear needs to adopt (for you guys it's really important to be more JS framework neutral IMO), but for JBoss. So the answer to "What JS frameworks can I use with Aerogear?" is different to the one "I want to use JBoss to build a mobile app, how do I do it?".
>>> 
>>> Hmmm. I feel like that could be confusing to someone new who says, "I want to use JBoss and AeroGear to build a mobile app" and we tell them JBoss says go with framework "X" but AeroGear says use what ever you like. This is not an easy thing to sort out. :-)
>> 
>> I suppose I see it as:
>> 
>> * You guys cover building apps with Aerogear on aerogear.org. Here, you cover a variety of JS frameworks working with Aerogear.
>> * You guys say "if you want to learn more about using Aerogear with other products in the JBoss suite, then see JBoss.org"
>> * On JBoss.org we are more focused on showing one JS framework.
>> 
>> WDYT?
>> 
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Pete
>>>> 
>>>> PS not sure what your team (internal) list is, please add it to the cc :-)
>>> 
>> 
>