[aerogear-dev] paging: different client platforms

Kris Borchers kris at redhat.com
Fri Jan 11 07:46:07 EST 2013


There were some discussions a long time ago but I don't remember ever coming to a conclusion on how paging should be implemented and I don't know any links to gists off the top of my head.

That being said, this and the Paging Demo thread have gotten me thinking that though I thought JS was ready, I see it is not. I had not thought about the metadata being in headers. Since we are abstracting away the HTTP request, it may make it harder to get at that information without us providing an API into it (well, maybe not for JS but it might be nice to have a built in way to access that info).

I think this deserves a more in-depth conversation than can happen in e-mail. Anyone up for a hangout ASAP to iron out what we want for the client APIs? This looks like it could get messy when trying to keep it flexible for the developer, though, this does make a great case/example for how useful my ideas for automatic client configuration come in. :)

On Jan 11, 2013, at 5:39 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> was there already some discussion (and proposal) for paging APIs on the client ?
> 
> It would be nice if the public client API semantics are somewhat
> identical on the different platforms.
> (I guess it's a MUST :))
> 
> Any pointers to gists etc are welcome
> 
> Thx
> 
> -- 
> Matthias Wessendorf
> 
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev




More information about the aerogear-dev mailing list