[aerogear-dev] Pagination Requirements Spec

[Matthias Wessendorf]

On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Douglas Campos <qmx at qmx.me> wrote:
> standards++

Looks like we agreed on using the RFC 5988 for the linking.

I think we "just" need to decide on the actual values...

1) the standard uses "previous" and "next"
2) github API uses "prev" and "next"

For my taste I like the "previous" and "next"...

I am sure we could even prefix it... ag-previous/ag-next - not sure
this is really needed...




>
> -- qmx
>
> On 15/01/2013, at 07:26, Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> we've created the following gist[1] to specify our requirements for pagination. We can discuss this on the mailing list and then update the doc as we go along. This will later be turned into a page under the spec section of the site.
>>
>> Nothing has been decide yet even if it might read like it has in the document.
>>
>> [1] https://gist.github.com/4537431
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf