[aerogear-dev] JIRA reference in poms
Jay Balunas
jbalunas at redhat.com
Mon Jul 1 14:51:42 EDT 2013
That is a tough one. My personal opinion right now is to keep just AEROGEAR. It is well be the least surprising for new users/developers.
I also think that part of the responsibility of reviewing AEROGEAR will be the re-assignment as needed as this is the most likely spot new users will post bugs they run into.
On Jun 29, 2013, at 12:54 PM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> Hi,
>
> should we list JIRA location in our (sub)project POM.xml files ?
>
> Should the AEROGEAR JIRA be used in master pom ?
>
> -Matthias
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20130701/50a00aae/attachment.html
More information about the aerogear-dev
mailing list