[aerogear-dev] Travis on branches
Summers Pittman
supittma at redhat.com
Wed Jul 17 10:45:21 EDT 2013
+1
On 07/17/2013 02:18 AM, Daniel Bevenius wrote:
> +1
>
> Den onsdagen den 17:e juli 2013 skrev Daniel Passos:
>
> +1
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 6:46 PM, Bruno Oliveira
> <bruno at abstractj.org <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
> 'bruno at abstractj.org');>> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> -
> abstractj
>
> On Jul 16, 2013, 6:26 PM, Douglas Campos wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 03:09:55PM -0500, Kris Borchers wrote:
>>> I would like to propose we only run Travis on changes to
>>> master (push,
>>> PR, etc). The problem I am having is pushing broken code to
>>> branches
>>> for review, testing, etc. is causing Travis to mark the repo
>>> as broken
>>> in the status image which is not true. Anyone have any other
>>> thoughts
>>> on this or feel that Travis breaking on branches is at all
>>> useful?
>> +1
>>
>> I tend to lazily push branches while I'm fixing stuff (and
>> waiting for
>> travis feedback), but I'm fine with travis only running on
>> the branch
>> when I actually open the PR.
>>
>> --
>> qmx
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
>> 'aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org');>
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
> 'aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org');>
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20130717/6290684f/attachment.html
More information about the aerogear-dev
mailing list