[aerogear-dev] [iOS] Push SDK release ?

[Christos Vasilakis]

On Jul 19, 2013, at 1:04 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org> wrote:

> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 11:42 AM, Christos Vasilakis <cvasilak at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On Jul 19, 2013, at 11:06 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 10:08 AM, Corinne Krych <corinnekrych at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I think consistency is key.
>> I would stick to Android/JS
>> When we feel the need to split we then then all.
>> 
>> +1
>>  
> 
> Personally, I am more into having the registration, as a separate library so it can be easily integrated into any iOS project,  
> 
> yes there are pros/cons for both approaches.
> 
> Initially I did it separated, because of the concern "Oh, for device registration, I really have to use all of that lib".
> 
>  
> but  we can stick on following the same approach as the other platforms and, as Corinne suggested, if the need arises we can split into the separate lib.
> 
> for consistency it makes sense, yes 
> (and than, I think, we should integrate the OTP bits, perhaps as well ?)

+1 if we follow this approach, makes sense that too.

>  
> 
> +1
> 
> Thanks,
> Christos
> 
> 
> 
>> 
>> Corinne
>> 
>> On Jul 19, 2013, at 10:03 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org> wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 5:34 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 5:29 PM, Daniel Passos <daniel at passos.me> wrote:
>>> Any particular reason for it not to be incorporated into the iOS library and be a separate project?
>>> 
>>> Not really.
>>> 
>>> I think it's not that bad if the lib is "isolated". For instance, if an iOS project just wants to use the UnifiedPush server, it's less of a "large" dependency for them to add.
>>> 
>>> However if folks want to make it part of the AeroGear-iOS project, that's fine too.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Any thoughts ?
>>> 
>>> I think both have pros/cons :-)  However, the JS and Android projects also include all the things in one lib, so I guess it's a good thing to follow that as well
>>> 
>>> 
>>> [ ] Include the Push bits in the AeroGear-iOS lib
>>> [ ] Keep the Push SDK separated
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -Matthias
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -Matthias
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 6:52 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> now that the most items for the iOS Push registration SDK ([1]) have been fixed, I'd like to get an "early" release out.
>>> 
>>> E.g. a 0.5.0 version of it.. (release often, release early)
>>> 
>>> Thoughts?
>>> 
>>> -Matthias 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> [1] https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-push-ios-registration
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Matthias Wessendorf 
>>> 
>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Matthias Wessendorf 
>>> 
>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Matthias Wessendorf 
>>> 
>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Matthias Wessendorf 
>> 
>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Matthias Wessendorf 
> 
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20130719/0647544d/attachment.html