[aerogear-dev] Unified Push Server user management questions
Deepali Khushraj
dkhushra at redhat.com
Wed Jun 5 20:38:01 EDT 2013
Sorry I am chiming in late.
I like the mock-ups. A few comments:
* It seems from the designs that the user can add only a single OS-specific variant per app. For example, I can create "Mobile HR" app with a single "HR iOS" variant, but not two variants like "HR iPad" and "HR iPhone free". I believe Matthias' lexicon states such multiple variants are possible per app. .
I think the way you've done is fine. However, if we choose this path then, I think, we need to update the specification and ensure the REST API won't allow multiple OS-specific variants per app, otherwise, they can't be shown in the UI.
* Apple's Push network has prod and dev environment options, a flag would be useful.
* The terms "Instance" and "Variant" will be unfamiliar terminologies to a new user. A help icon on the screen or just some text explaining the meanings of these terms to new comers would be helpful
* Terminology suggestion:
Instance -> "Active user instances" or just "User instances"
* I found the name "Variants and Push Networks" confusing. I would suggest we use one :)
* I noticed you added links to download client SDKs, which is great. I think a link to the Sender REST API spec would be useful too.
* I found our iOS tutorial to be really helpful. It got the user up and running really quickly. This is something I struggled with Urban Airship and other services. Linking ours to the console could be a real value add to first-time users
* We need to check the security aspect of showing end-user emails in the instances tab to the developers of the app.
* Also, if an app gets really popular then this list will likely be really long, like thousands of users. Not sure if our console could handle that. I think this feature of being able to see instances is great in "development mode" or during apps' "beta testing" though.
* Is the check-mark in first screen used to make an app active Vs inactive?
* I like that you show the variants summary in first screen, wondering if we could use icons there for iOS, Android & web.
* I was wondering if we could consider some UX ideas for first-time user experience. I imagine a lot of users using this service would never have used Push before, so they may need some hand holding and the UI is a great way to start that.
I am compiling a list of future use cases, will share that on the list next.
What you have is already very nice.
Thanks!
Deepali.
On Jun 4, 2013, at 11:26 AM, Hylke Bons <hbons at redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It seems that most of us are happy with the wireframes for the Unified
> Push Server admin UI. I've used the feedback to make a few small
> changes:
> https://github.com/hbons/aerogear-design/blob/master/aerogear_unified_push_server_admin_ui.png
>
> The next step is to look at the the missing features like the user
> management and authentication. It would be good to have a discussion
> about this, and I have some questions too.
>
> If I understand things correctly, the Push Server can run "standalone"
> or as a component in JBoss AS (or something else). So we'll need a UI
> for user management when we run standalone, but one that can be disabled
> and be plugged in by different existing auth systems that are running on
> the server or somewhere else.
>
> Some questions that come to mind:
>
> How is the server bootstrapped? And how is the initial user account
> configured? The most essential basic role would be to access the UI and
> to configure push notifications (and one to add other (admin) users).
> Are there any other roles that we should be considering? Things that
> should be disabled for some users?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Hylke
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20130605/63e7598b/attachment.html
More information about the aerogear-dev
mailing list