[aerogear-dev] Versioning

Kris Borchers kris at redhat.com
Thu Jun 6 09:33:10 EDT 2013


On Jun 6, 2013, at 8:27 AM, Douglas Campos <qmx at qmx.me> wrote:

> On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 02:56:53PM -0500, Kris Borchers wrote:
>> So we haven't talked about this for a while so I thought I would stir
>> the fire again. Does anyone have any objection to JS managing our
>> versions as such:
>> 
>> I would like to move what is currently in master to a 1-0-stable branch
>> Then I would like to update master's build version to 1.1.0-pre
>> All work is done on the master branch then if the change is applicable
>> to 1.0.0, it can be cherry-picked into the 1-0-stable branch
> My take on this:
> 
> -1 for the stable label - if people want stable, they want releases

Unless they want a custom build as a task in their build process but that's probably an edge. So I'll go with no -stable
> +1 for the version bump - java(ish) projects already does this via
> maven-release-plugin (1.1.0-SNAPSHOT) - but I think -pre isn't clear as
> -dev is (we use .dev on jruby)

I am fine with -dev, just wanted something and -pre is what I was used to with jQuery but -dev is fine too.
> 
> -- 
> qmx
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev




More information about the aerogear-dev mailing list