[aerogear-dev] Versioning

Christos Vasilakis cvasilak at gmail.com
Thu Jun 6 14:36:29 EDT 2013


On Jun 6, 2013, at 5:51 PM, Kris Borchers <kris at redhat.com> wrote:

> OK, for the sake of peace I will concede to no stable branch so that we can move on. If it doesn't work well we can always change it.

+1

not much into names I am happy with whatever the team chooses.

Thanks


> 
> Everyone else please voice your opinions still so we can get agreement on this. We don't all have to agree which is why we discuss. :)


> 
> On Jun 6, 2013, at 9:37 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Kris Borchers <kris at redhat.com> wrote:
>> 
>> On Jun 6, 2013, at 9:31 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org> wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Douglas Campos <qmx at qmx.me> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 02:56:53PM -0500, Kris Borchers wrote:
>>> > So we haven't talked about this for a while so I thought I would stir
>>> > the fire again. Does anyone have any objection to JS managing our
>>> > versions as such:
>>> >
>>> > I would like to move what is currently in master to a 1-0-stable branch
>>> > Then I would like to update master's build version to 1.1.0-pre
>>> > All work is done on the master branch then if the change is applicable
>>> > to 1.0.0, it can be cherry-picked into the 1-0-stable branch
>>> My take on this:
>>> 
>>> -1 for the stable label - if people want stable, they want releases
>>> 
>>> I do not like -stable as well. And yes. the _final_ TAG is the release. I do agree here!
>> 
>> Can you, and everyone else be more specific here. Do you not like the label, or the whole idea of a stable branch?
>> 
>> Not liking "stable branch". For me that is a TAG (immutable). 
>> 
>>  
>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>  
>>> +1 for the version bump - java(ish) projects already does this via
>>> maven-release-plugin (1.1.0-SNAPSHOT) - but I think -pre isn't clear as
>>> -dev is (we use .dev on jruby)
>>> 
>>> I don't have strong feelings for -dev -snapshot,  or what ever :-)
>>> 
>>> IMO both, for example, -dev or -snapshot, make it clear: current dev is here.
>>> 
>>> So, I am happy with -dev or -snapshot (or -pre) :) 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> --
>>> qmx
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Matthias Wessendorf 
>>> 
>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Matthias Wessendorf 
>> 
>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> 
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20130606/86961ed3/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the aerogear-dev mailing list