[aerogear-dev] Project Meetings, Hangouts and Stuff

[Matthias Wessendorf]

Generally, I do like IRC based meetings.


On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 5:43 PM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno at abstractj.org> wrote:

> My suggestion is fire the invitations 10 minutes before and if we face
> with any kind of issues switch to IRC meetings.
>


+1 that is a good option,
but I guess the point that qmx is making is "lack of information". I think
that things are more explicit when the meeting is on IRC.

+ there is an archived version of it.   Right now we post the agenda, which
is good, but this does not always reflect the discussions around some of
the items on the agenda.

On the other hand, I can see what qmx also stated: A video conference may
feel more productive.


Why not trying two meetings, based on IRC. Afterwards we can reflect things.



-M



>
> Douglas Campos wrote:
> > Howdy!
> >
> > Today after the hangout failure I realized how bad is for the project to
> > have hangouts for the project meetings - and how they make us more
> > closed than we should be.
> > (just as a background, we did have IRC meetings in the past, but since
> > we were 4 people only, having the hangouts "felt" more productive - and
> > the benefits made the problems less obvious to us).
> >
> > So I propose that we move back to IRC meetings for now, and keep the
> > hangouts only for internal topics and non-project stuff.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
>
> --
> abstractj
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20130617/8311c23d/attachment.html