[aerogear-dev] Push Authentication

Bruno Oliveira bruno at abstractj.org
Wed Jun 19 05:55:18 EDT 2013


Correct, our friend AeroGearUser became a zombie and no more belongs to 
our ecosystem.

If someone is concerned about: username, loginName, whaTeVerName. It 
must be coordinated between server and client.

Possible solutions:

- Accept 'username' as pretty name on the endpoint and make use of DTOs 
(I don't like)
- Accept flexible names on client APIs +1
- Extend SimpleUser from PL (I don't like it)

Bear in mind that every security framework will have their own 
implementation and AeroGear security doesn't have control over it.

Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> The PushServer is based on AeroGear security 1.0.1, and AeroGearUser is
> gone in there.
> With the 1.0.1 + PL The "underlying" PL User uses "loginName".
> With AeroGear-Sec 1.0.0 we had the AeroGear User, which used "username".
>
> That's the entire explanation :)
>
>
> Coming back to the point of "configuration", that's needed on Android
> and iOS (like the JS bits) for the matter of the "user" in AeroGear-Shiro
> is using "username" as well, while the PL "User" has "loginName".

-- 
abstractj



More information about the aerogear-dev mailing list