[aerogear-dev] Initial Security for AeroGear UnifiedPush
Bruno Oliveira
bruno at abstractj.org
Wed Jun 19 13:29:10 EDT 2013
Just to let you know, I opened the following jira
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGSEC-68 and already attached a PR.
The whole idea is as soon as we on the authorization model, extract it
to AGSEC. I'll also start some unit testing to the endpoints.
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 6:15 PM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno at abstractj.org
> <mailto:bruno at abstractj.org>> wrote:
>
> I do it, if we're not using the interceptor we're just hiding a issue
> and duplicating code.
>
>
> I agree on that :)
>
>
> - Issue: The endpoint should return 401 instead of bad request on
> requests.
>
>
> correct.
>
> So, how about:
> I give it another try tomorrow and will report back ?
>
> -Matthias
>
>
> Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> > I think I didn't use it, because it throws an RT exception (no
> problem
> > with that), which I could catch on the RestEasy layer.
> > Instead of (for unauthorized invokes) returning 401 (to cURL, for
> > instance), it was just "bad request".
> >
> > So, I went for the "check by code" solution first. Not saying
> that I am
> > AGAINST the interceptor.
> >
> > I think on the long run that would be better and cleaner.
>
> --
> abstractj
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org>
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
--
abstractj
More information about the aerogear-dev
mailing list