[aerogear-dev] Project Meetings, Hangouts and Stuff

[Kris Borchers]

On Jun 24, 2013, at 8:35 AM, Jay Balunas <jbalunas at redhat.com> wrote:

> Hi All,
> 
> For the RichFaces project we used IRC meetings and I thought it worked out really well!  We used meetbot [1], so had nice minutes, and once you get used to the hashtags it becomes much more productive.  Another nice benefit is that language becomes less of an issue, and there is little worry about talking over each other.

I disagree that language is less of an issue. A lot of times I have found that discussions over the ML and IRC have fallen short and only the in person discussions resolved issues that were completely misunderstood over multiple e-mails and IRC discussions.
> 
> As Qmx said we used to have IRC meetings and switched to hangout, but I think it is best if we switch back.
> 
> As for time the meetings take, I actually think we can get through the agenda quicker in some cases.  

My point wasn't the agenda length but the amount of items that get discussed because they are sparked by other items on the agenda. Many of those discussion have been invaluable and I feel they will be lost moving to IRC meetings.
> 
> So for today lets go with it, and we can post the link to the logs to the mailing list as well.

We'll see how it goes but I have my reservations.
> 
> -Jay
> 
> [1] http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot
> 
> 
> On Jun 22, 2013, at 6:01 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Saturday, June 22, 2013, Corinne Krych wrote:
>> Let's try it!
>> 
>> 
>> yeah!! \o/
>> 
>> 
>>  
>> On Jun 22, 2013 10:35 AM, "Matthias Wessendorf" <matzew at apache.org> wrote:
>> any result here?
>> 
>> Should we try the open IRC meeting style? 
>> 
>> On Tuesday, June 18, 2013, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 11:27 PM, Douglas Campos <qmx at qmx.me> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 08:51:43PM +0200, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>> > perhaps a better "meeting minutes" solution would make it more open ?
>> Honestly I don't think we have a better option than IRC meetings -
>> Doing the meetings on video is kinda like the same as if we sat together
>> inside a room and used whiteboards for all the discussion, then just
>> posted pictures of the boards.
>> 
>> I know it's more work doing it on a written form, but I think it'll pay
>> off in the future.
>> 
>> Let's try...
>> also, when folks are "gone" (e.g. vacation what not), this is more transparent and easy to read-up on "meetings".
>> right now: almost zero chance of knowing what's going on
>>  
>> 
>> --
>> qmx
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Matthias Wessendorf 
>> 
>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Matthias Wessendorf 
>> 
>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Matthias Wessendorf 
>> 
>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> 
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20130624/7f786de7/attachment.html