[aerogear-dev] Unified Push Server user management questions
Matthias Wessendorf
matzew at apache.org
Thu Jun 27 03:12:46 EDT 2013
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 11:29 PM, Hylke Bons <hbons at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
>>> i was looking at this again and a question popped into my head.
>>> Doesn't each variant need there own certificate/google key.
>>>
>>> So, for example, we have an "HR App", this app has 3 variants
>>> 1. free version
>>> 2. paid version
>>> 3. some other really cool version
>>>
>>> i'm assuming that should be 3 different certs/keys ( for development,
>>> another set for prod ). i'm not sure the wireframes represent this correctly
>>>
>>
>>
>> yes. the spec is indicating that!
>> Does the UI lead to confusion?
>>
>>
>> In it's current wireframe form yes.
>>
>> But with this confirmation. we should be good going forward
>>
>>
>>
> I don't see this in the spec.
> Can you point me to the lines that mention this?
>
See:
https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear.org/blob/master/docs/specs/aerogear-server-push/index.markdown#mobile-variant
"There can be multiple variants for a *Push Application* (e.g. HR Android, HR
iPad,HR iPhone free, HR iPhone premium or HR Mobile Web). A *Mobile
Variant* contains
platform specific properties, such as a*Google API key* (Android) "
So... for me that is clear if I have:
* HR-iOS-Tablet free
* HR-iOS-Tablet paid
* HR-iOS-Phone free
* HR-Android-Phone paid
* HR-Android-Watch free
that every of these variants have different certs/keys (since they all do
have different APP IDs in the appstore(s) as well)
-Matthias
>
>
> Hylke
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20130627/713fd5b5/attachment.html
More information about the aerogear-dev
mailing list