[aerogear-dev] Push Endpoints

[Matthias Wessendorf]

On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc at gmail.com>wrote:

> Hum for both for me it should be an 200 OK with no reponse body. For the
> update is we have a 200 OK , it is the responsability of the client to do a
> GET to retrive the updated client
>
Agree on the GET

>
>
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Lucas Holmquist <lholmqui at redhat.com>wrote:
>
>> I've been looking at the endpoints of the push server a little more since
>> coding the Admin UI, and i see that for "updates" and "deletes", the
>> response is "no content"
>>
>> for example:
>>
>> https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unified-push-server/blob/master/src/main/java/org/jboss/aerogear/connectivity/rest/registry/applications/PushApplicationEndpoint.java#L117
>>
>>
>> I wasn't sure what we should be returning here.
>>
>> I'd imagine for update we would want to return the update entity
>>
>> but what about for delete?  In the case of deleting a "Push Application",
>>  should we return the new list of Push Applications?
>>
>>
>> thoughts?
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20130627/5ce3467f/attachment.html