[aerogear-dev] Unified Push Server user management questions

[Matthias Wessendorf]

On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Hylke Bons <hbons at redhat.com> wrote:

>  On 28/06/2013 11:52, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>
>
>   Thanks. So what's the use case for this? Why would you not want to not
>> use push networks specified for the main app? Also, how common is this?
>>
>
>  in apple, every app id (== variant) needs it's OWN certificate.
>
>  That's why it is modeled that way
>
>
> This only applies to Apple APNs? I'd say if there isn't a technical reason
> why you'd want to this for the other networks we leave it out for those.
>

In Google you would use different API keys - in SimplePush it could be a
different cloud provider etc


Not sure why this would be a problem


>
> Thanks,
>
> Hylke
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20130628/484f9eb5/attachment.html