[aerogear-dev] [Android] Android project structure for final

[Sebastien Blanc]

+1 on keeping UT with the lib
If Laurel was the library, the unit tests would be Hardy


On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 1:16 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org>wrote:

> On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 12:59 PM, Kris Borchers <kris at redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mar 1, 2013, at 12:38 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 2:02 AM, Douglas Campos <qmx at qmx.me> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On 28/02/2013, at 20:07, Summers Pittman <supittma at redhat.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> aerogear-android-tests: This will house all of the Aerogear tests for
> >>>> Android.
> >>>
> >>> You mean moving all the tests? Can't this be only for integration
> tests, and the unit tests stay on the aerogear-android project?
> >>
> >> I'd also prefer to have the unit tests for each of the libs
> >> (aerogear-android + aerogear-android-support) being in there.
> >
> > I can see one reason to have the unit tests in a separate project. I
> assume both aerogear-android and aerogear-android-support would have pretty
> much identical tests since their functionality should
> > be the same, right? It would be a pain to have to maintain multiple sets
> of the same tests across projects.
> >>
>
> Not sure about the details, BUT... you misread.
>
> Unit tests belong to the library. I am -1000 on having a 'unit test'
> only broject.
>
> Integration tests are different, they _should_ be separated
>
> -M
>
> >> Only integration tests should be a totally independent project,
> >> consuming the other libs (aerogear-android + aerogear-android-support)
> >> and having tests against em.
> >>
> >> -M
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>> -- qmx
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> aerogear-dev mailing list
> >>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Matthias Wessendorf
> >>
> >> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> >> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> >> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> aerogear-dev mailing list
> >> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > aerogear-dev mailing list
> > aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20130301/20e933ae/attachment.html