[aerogear-dev] [RFC] Initial Versioning Policy

[Bruno Oliveira]

+1

On Mar 15, 2013, at 12:26 PM, Douglas Campos <qmx at qmx.me> wrote:

> Thoughts?
> 
> -- cut here --
> # AeroGear Versioning Policy
> 
> For this 1.0.0 release and beyond we're planning some significant changes on how we do versioning for the project.
> 
> ## TL;DR
> 
> We're sticking to the de-facto standard of `major`.`minor`.`patchlevel`, mostly know as Semantic Versioning, or just [semver].
> 
> ## A bit of history
> 
> During the early days of the project, we started following the [JBoss Project Versioning] - at that time our assets were mostly Java. Then we found out later that we were doing it wrong, because we forgot the timestamp part of the milestone releases.
> 
> ## Getting it right
> 
> So we're going to release 1.0.0 in a few days, and we'll drop the suffixes and work with versions like this:
> 
> - **bugfixes**: 
>    - increment `patch` (1.0.0 -> 1.0.1)
> 
>    Bugfixes and minor changes: keeps API compatibility
> - **new features and small breaking changes**:
>    - increment `minor` (1.0.1 -> 1.1.0)
> 
>    **Small breaking changes** means that some work **may** be needed for updating beetween minor versions.
> - **major releases**:
>    - increment `major` (1.1.0 -> 2.0.0)
> 
>    Mostly backward incompatible changes and/or when a group of big features is ready.
> 
> Any release can use the discriminators .alpha/.beta/.pre for testing, those are sorted right.
> 
> 
> [semver]:http://semver.org 
> [JBoss Project Versioning]:https://community.jboss.org/wiki/JBossProjectVersioning
> 
> -- qmx
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev