[aerogear-dev] Maintenance branches
Kris Borchers
kris at redhat.com
Tue Mar 26 11:34:50 EDT 2013
OK. I guess having in progress versions not match is ok.
On Mar 26, 2013, at 10:33 AM, Douglas Campos <qmx at qmx.me> wrote:
> exactly, you won't use SNAPSHOT, maven forces you to do so, and has a dedicated repo for intermediate "on the go" release"
>
> On 26/03/2013, at 12:31, Kris Borchers <kris at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> I think it does apply. I need a version to put in my package.json on master to indicate it's the next version in progress.
>>
>> On Mar 26, 2013, at 10:30 AM, Douglas Campos <qmx at qmx.me> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On 26/03/2013, at 12:21, Kris Borchers <kris at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> -SNAPSHOT makes my skin crawl. Can we use the more semver way of -pre?
>>>
>>> er, this is maven, ignore it - doesn't apply to JS, nor iOS
>>>
>>> --
>>> qmx
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
> --
> qmx
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
More information about the aerogear-dev
mailing list