[aerogear-dev] Controller consumes - defaults... / settings
Kris Borchers
kborcher at redhat.com
Thu Mar 28 17:56:35 EDT 2013
I am also +1 for this. I guess I never thought about it since I'm used to just using a chrome extension which allows me to edit headers on the fly.
On Mar 28, 2013, at 9:26 AM, Summers Pittman <supittma at redhat.com> wrote:
> +1 to this as well.
>
>
>
> On 03/28/2013 06:59 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>> I've create a ticket:
>> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AEROGEAR-1067
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Daniel Bevenius
>>> <daniel.bevenius at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> so let's see what the best "option" is to make it a good dev. experience :)
>>>> If this will help developers then lets add it :)
>>>>
>>>> We would need to look into this and have some special handling for producers
>>>> (it's what media types a route produces that is matched with the Accept
>>>> header in the request). Perhaps if the route only specifies that it
>>>> produces("application/json"), and if a request has an Accept header that is
>>>> "text/html", then we simply accept that too for the route and return json.
>>>
>>> +1 I like that !!!
>>>
>>>> But if it the route specifically produces "text/html" it should be forwarded
>>>> to the view.
>>>>
>>>> Please create a feature request for this and we can look into it.
>>> kk - will link to this thread, so that we don't loose the discussions
>>> around here
>>>
>>> -M
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 28 March 2013 11:45, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org> wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno at abstractj.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> Nothing odd, just something not tested/required before ;)
>>>>> so let's see what the best "option" is to make it a good dev. experience
>>>>> :)
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> "The measure of a man is what he does with power" - Plato
>>>>>> -
>>>>>> @abstractj
>>>>>> -
>>>>>> Volenti Nihil Difficile
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thursday, March 28, 2013 at 7:36 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> receiving a 404 is a bit odd - at least I feel it that way :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>>>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>>>>
>>>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>>
>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
More information about the aerogear-dev
mailing list