[aerogear-dev] Android Team - Meeting note 20130508

[Bruno Oliveira]

Thanks for the heads up guys.

Daniel Passos wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> Summers and I had a meeting today to talking about some issues. 
> Meeting note: 
> https://github.com/aerogear/collateral/wiki/20130508-android-mtg-agenda
>
>
>     Pipe vs Authentication
>
>   * Do we still need to pass the authModule the pipe?
>       o Yes.
>
>
>     <https://github.com/aerogear/collateral/wiki/20130508-android-mtg-agenda#pipe-retrieve-data-by-id-aerogear-1162>Pipe
>     "retrieve data by ID" AEROGEAR-1162
>     <https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AEROGEAR-1162>
>
>   * Why we don't need it?
>       o We need it, but it is probably a subset of a bigger read issue.
>       o setLinkUri is a awful hack for setting an ID Gist example
>         <https://gist.github.com/secondsun/66c141f026c3a83191f2>
>       o maybe create Pipe.read(String id, Callback callback)?
>
>
>     <https://github.com/aerogear/collateral/wiki/20130508-android-mtg-agenda#pipe-readwithfilter-aerogear-1212>Pipe
>     "readWithFilter" AEROGEAR-1212
>     <https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AEROGEAR-1212>
>
>   * We have a different approach between server and client. Server
>     expect "?color=red", client produce
>     "?where=%7B%22color%22:%22red%22%7D"
>       o ReadFilter setWhere isn't correct
>       o Creates a where=params instead of params?
>       o No way to create ?params=values
>       o Should depracate readWithFilter and rename to just read()?
>         AEROGEAR-1214 <https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AEROGEAR-1214>
>           + This goes back and forth because iOS needs readWithFilter.
>             ML Thread
>             <http://aerogear-dev.1069024.n5.nabble.com/aerogear-dev-Client-Paging-Strawman-tt1277.html#a1387>
>
>
>     <https://github.com/aerogear/collateral/wiki/20130508-android-mtg-agenda#nested-resource>Nested
>     Resource
>
>   * Should we work on that? We really need it?
>       o it really doesn't "fit" in Android as things stand
>
>
>     <https://github.com/aerogear/collateral/wiki/20130508-android-mtg-agenda#unified-push>Unified
>     Push
>
>   * We need to work on it now? That should be our priority?
>       o It isn't a priority right now. Looking at jay and qmx's
>         roadmap it looks like we don't need to worry about it until July.
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev