[aerogear-dev] AGPUSH Components

[Matthias Wessendorf]

What about the following


Specific Components

The following are very specific to a certain part of the "work":

   - UnifiedPush-server
   - UnifiedPush-ios
   - UnifiedPush-android
   - UnifiedPush-javascript
   - UnifiedPush-admin
   - UnifiedPush-java(-sender)
   - UnifiedPush-aps
   - UnifiedPush-gcm
   - UnifiedPush-simplePush (=== connection TO (various) SP networks)
   - SimplePush-server
   - SimplePush-javascript (=== client, I think there is only a JS client)


Now, various of the above "component" have similar concerns, like *security*
 or *documentation*.
<https://gist.github.com/matzew/90c9f6837eee6cb074cc#generic-components-eg-used-like-a-tag>Generic
components (e.g. used like a tag)

   - security
   - Documentation
   - Examples
   - PushNetwork (e.g. when investigating for adding new supported ones...)
   - OpenShift (support for UP / SP)
   - Tooling (== Tooling / RAD )

Perhaps these are really more *tags*, but I am fine in "abusing" these
components as tags.


On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 9:37 PM, Jay Balunas <jbalunas at redhat.com> wrote:

> +1 - I added a comment related to this.
>
> Also, I'm not sure if Jira has "Component Themes" like it has other
> things, but there will be a lot of shared components between the various AG
> Jira's.  I think it will be important to be consistent where possible
> (capitalization, abbreviations, naming, etc...).
>
> On May 20, 2013, at 3:23 PM, Bruno Oliveira wrote:
>
> > Not sure what's the main idea, but for security we can do something like:
> >
> > AGPUSH-your-favorite-component-here, security
> >
> > If we start to create new components for security per project, it will
> > add more confusion. At least to me.
> >
> > Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> >> Howdy,
> >>
> >> added a few comments
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 8:52 AM, Daniel Bevenius
> >> <daniel.bevenius at gmail.com <mailto:daniel.bevenius at gmail.com>> wrote:
> >>
> >>    Looks good!
> >>
> >>
> >>    On 16 May 2013 18:38, Kris Borchers <kris at redhat.com
> >>    <mailto:kris at redhat.com>> wrote:
> >>
> >>        Hey all,
> >>
> >>        Please take a look at
> >>        https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-11 and let me know if you
> >>        would add/change/remove any suggested components I have
> >>        suggested there.
> >>
> >>        Thanks!
> >>
> >>        _______________________________________________
> >>        aerogear-dev mailing list
> >>        aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org>
> >>        https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>    _______________________________________________
> >>    aerogear-dev mailing list
> >>    aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org>
> >>    https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Matthias Wessendorf
> >>
> >> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> >> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> >> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> aerogear-dev mailing list
> >> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> > _______________________________________________
> > aerogear-dev mailing list
> > aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20130521/d615f1a7/attachment.html