[aerogear-dev] Give them a good home

[Bruno Oliveira]

+1 Leave as is

Developers can always choose which dependency they would like to add on 
JS land.

Kris Borchers wrote:
> In our team meeting today, I brought up the question of whether or not
> the JavaScript clients for both SimplePush and Unified Push should live
> in folders under AeroGear.js or in their own repos. I would like to open
> this up to suggestions from the team. Please vote below.
>
> SimplePush
> Currently, this lives under AeroGear.js at
> https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-js/tree/Notifier/src/simple-push
> IMO, this makes sense since it also has a hard dependency on Notifier
> which lives here
> https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-js/tree/Notifier/src/notifier
> I would vote this remain where it is. Please vote whether or not this
> should remain in the AeroGear.js repo.
>
>
> Unified Push
> Currently, this lives under AeroGear.js at
> https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-js/tree/Notifier/src/unified-push
> IMO, this is not necessary since it could be used independently from the
> rest of AeroGear. I would vote that this move to a separate repo. This
> would also mean that the client object's name would change since it is
> currently namespaced under AeroGear as AeroGear.UnifiedPushClient. I
> would suggest it be renamed to AGUnifiedPushClient and be added to a
> repo named aerogear/unified-push-js. Please vote for whether or not this
> should move and if it should, an object name and repo name.
>
> Thanks!
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev