[aerogear-dev] AeroGear Push Message Format

[Corinne Krych]

in selective push is:
==> variant: iOS  + alias: mwessendorf
a valid criteria too?


On 28 May 2013 08:51, Corinne Krych <corinnekrych at gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
>
> On 28 May 2013 08:48, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org> wrote:
>
>> TYPO:
>> ==> variant: iOS (since a PushAPP _might_ have only one iOS variant) +
>> deviceType:iPadMini  + alias: mwessendorf
>> or
>> ==> variant: iOS (since a PushAPP _might_ have only one iOS variant) +
>> deviceType:iPhone  + alias: mwessendorf
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 8:43 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org>wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 12:00 AM, Corinne Krych <corinnekrych at gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> When doing selective push query, is there any overlap between mobile
>>>> variant (which I understand like mobile type which contains certificates)
>>>> and device type?
>>>>
>>>
>>> MobileVariant (or call it type) is something like "Android", or "iOS".
>>> deviceTypes would be iPad, iPod, iPhone, iWatch :)  - or "Android
>>> Table", "Andrpid phone", android what not
>>>
>>>
>>> Sure.... ideally there are several variants:
>>> - iOS iPhone 5 optimised app in the app store
>>> - iOS iPhone 4s optimised app in the app store
>>> - iOS iPhone 3 optimised app in the app store
>>> - iOS iPad mini optimised app in the app store
>>> etc :)
>>>
>>> But, if there is only one variant, it's totally valid to install an iOS
>>> application (from the appstore), on an iPad and an iPhone;
>>>
>>>
>>>> Both aimed at defining categories.
>>>>  Are those categories defined and fixed in the spec or can they be
>>>> extended?
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I don't understand categories, here
>>>
>>>
>>>> Can we do a selective push based on mobileType=mobile variant and
>>>> alias=john at gmail?
>>>>
>>>
>>> deviceType and alias should be possible;
>>> It should be also possible to combine that with a variant
>>>
>>> ==> variant: iOS (since we have only one iOS varaint) +
>>> deviceType:iPadMini  + alias: mwessendorf
>>>
>>> I need to add that to the "Message Format" / spec
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 27 May 2013 23:36, Kris Borchers <kborcher at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Unifying the APIs shouldn't be hard and could probably happen sooner
>>>>> rather than later, IMO. As far as the client goes, if you send extra info
>>>>> beyond the version it will just be ignored. Though, it would be better to
>>>>> not send the extra info to keep payload small. I guess the issue would be
>>>>> on the SPS side and if it can handle receiving and ignoring the extra info.
>>>>>
>>>>> On May 27, 2013, at 14:06, Daniel Passos <daniel at passos.me> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> > Very nice!
>>>>> > +1 to discuss later how to "unify" APIs
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>>>>> >> We /could/ (later?) try to unify the API and simply
>>>>> >> *IGNORE* everything besides the version, when talking
>>>>> >> to|SimplePush| Variant.
>>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>>> > aerogear-dev mailing list
>>>>> > aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>>
>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>
>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20130528/a02f13f5/attachment-0001.html