[aerogear-dev] AeroGear Push Message Format
Matthias Wessendorf
matzew at apache.org
Fri May 31 12:39:05 EDT 2013
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-86
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 6:25 PM, Luke Holmquist <lholmqui at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On May 31, 2013, at 12:24 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> somehow the device needs to say: "I belong to android variant"
>
> besides the @Id /PK, we can have a second field / column that represents:
> * PushAppID
> * VariantID
>
> Yup. Having these would solve that
>
>
>
> Was that your question?
>
> On Friday, May 31, 2013, Lucas Holmquist wrote:
>
>> something that i was thinking about after doing some examples is that i'm
>> not sure how i feel about using the PK's of each table as the identifier to
>> register/broadcast clients.
>>
>> We are sort of giving meaning to data that really shouldn't have meaning.
>> it should really only be used to identify the row. It might be better to
>> have another key on each table/object that is the identifier.
>>
>> So in one of the examples i did, the app on the device will register the
>> device with the push server, but i needed to also include the id of the
>> variant instance
>>
>> i guess i'm thinking if someone migrates their database, these keys
>> could get messed up.
>>
>>
>> wdyt?
>>
>>
>> On May 28, 2013, at 2:53 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 8:51 AM, Corinne Krych <corinnekrych at gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>> in selective push is:
>> ==> variant: iOS + alias: mwessendorf
>> a valid criteria too?
>>
>>
>>
>> yes. let me update the related doc(s)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 28 May 2013 08:51, Corinne Krych <corinnekrych at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 28 May 2013 08:48, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> TYPO:
>> ==> variant: iOS (since a PushAPP _might_ have only one iOS variant) +
>> deviceType:iPadMini + alias: mwessendorf
>> or
>> ==> variant: iOS (since a PushAPP _might_ have only one iOS variant) +
>> deviceType:iPhone + alias: mwessendorf
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 8:43 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org>wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 12:00 AM, Corinne Krych <corinnekrych at gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>> When doing selective push query, is there any overlap between mobile
>> variant (which I understand like mobile type which contains certificates)
>> and device type?
>>
>>
>> MobileVariant (or call it type) is something like "Android", or "iOS".
>> deviceTypes would be iPad, iPod, iPhone, iWatch :) - or "Android Table",
>> "Andrpid phone", android what not
>>
>>
>> Sure.... ideally there are several variants:
>> - iOS iPhone 5 optimised app in the app store
>> - iOS iPhone 4s optimised app in the app store
>> - iOS iPhone 3 optimised app in the app store
>> - iOS iPad mini optimised app in the app store
>> etc :)
>>
>> But, if there is only one variant, it's totally valid to install an iOS
>> application (from the appstore), on an iPad and an iPhone;
>>
>>
>> Both aimed at defining categories.
>> Are those categories defined and fixed in the spec or can they be
>> extended?
>>
>>
>>
>> I don't understand categories, here
>>
>>
>> Can we do a selective push based on mobileType=mobile variant and
>> alias=john at gmail?
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20130531/988d36c5/attachment-0001.html
More information about the aerogear-dev
mailing list