[aerogear-dev] [UnifiedPush] cascase deletes ?

[Matthias Wessendorf]

What do you mean with both ?



On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 2:56 PM, Lucas Holmquist <lholmqui at redhat.com>wrote:

> is it possible to do both?
> On Nov 22, 2013, at 8:38 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> I was wondering if we should do cascading deletes for the device
> metadata....
>
> So, right now, when you are deleting a variant, all its installations are
> NOT nuked, which helps when you are interested in collecting data....
>
>
> However we could nuke em, not sure....
>
> Or... should we move them into a "DELETED" table?
>
> Users of the UnifiedPush Server might be interested in keeping the data
> around, a bit ....
>
> I am not sure...
>
>
> -Matthias
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20131122/b21c1233/attachment.html