[aerogear-dev] iOS Crypto questions

[Corinne Krych]

Far form me the idea of respicing each language's idiomatisms

JavaScript's encrypt method takes one parameter, a literal containing all information: key, IV and message.
Java initialize its object with password information and then the encrypt method takes 2 parameters: IV + message

Both JS and Java methods have the same name: encrypt.
My proposal was just to try to gather together the information in a more similar way.


On Oct 19, 2013, at 5:09 AM, Kris Borchers <kris at redhat.com> wrote:

> 
> On Oct 18, 2013, at 9:48 PM, Douglas Campos <qmx at qmx.me> wrote:
> 
>> On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 11:52:11PM +0200, Corinne Krych wrote:
>>> Doug,
>>> 
>>> Thanks for your reply.
>>> I think one the goal of AeroGear is to provide an unified API across
>>> different platforms even if it brings some challenges…
>>> I'm convinced we can come up with a similar API for encryption.
>> 
>> That's exactly what I'm talking about, the APIs are similar, but they
>> should respect the languages' idiomatisms:
>> 
>> // JS code
>> x.encrypt({a:'', b:''});
>> 
>> // Java code
>> x.encrypt(a, b);
>> 
>> Why should I impose Java style over JS?
> 
> +9001
>> 
>> -- 
>> qmx_______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev