[aerogear-dev] [UnifiedPush Server] Using JBoss Logging ?

[Matthias Wessendorf]

Oh, yeah - those are valid concerns.

Let's stick to JUL ?




On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Karel Piwko <kpiwko at redhat.com> wrote:

> I like JUL because it has no dependencies, stable API (albeit not feature
> complete) and no class path clashes.
>
> If you go with JBoss Logging, what would be the strategy for:
>
> 1/ Running UPS on Server in application platform that does not provide
> JBoss
> Logging?
> 2/ JBossLogging version conflicts - WF provides version 3.2, UPS needs
> 3.1+ and
> KC needs 3.0+?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Karel
>
>
>
> On Sat, 5 Apr 2014 14:27:52 +0200
> Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > right now we are using JUL for logging. That works fine, so far :-)
> >
> > However related projects (e.g. Keycloak / LiveOak) are using JBoss
> Logging.
> > I somewhat feel that it's perhaps not a bad idea if we would use JBoss
> > logging as well...
> >
> > I know there are a gazillion different Java logging frameworks out there
> > (yikes), but my question is really: keep JUL or go with JBoss-Logging :)
> >
> >
> > Thanks!
> > Matthias
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20140407/c6e71f0b/attachment.html