[aerogear-dev] Differences between Firefox OS "native" Push lib and AeroGear's Push adapter

Lucas Holmquist lholmqui at redhat.com
Mon Apr 7 14:09:48 EDT 2014


On Apr 7, 2014, at 12:52 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org> wrote:

> Ok,
> 
> So as token, we use the endpointURL, and on client we perform  the encodeURIComponent() function ?

i think so( as suggested 2 months ago  :) )   i just need to see how this will affect how we store stuff in LS.



> 
> -Matthias
> 
> On Monday, April 7, 2014, Lucas Holmquist <lholmqui at redhat.com> wrote:
> so i went back to look at what i had,
> 
> 
> i don't think we need to get to complicated here,
> 
> reading the spec stuff, and this example
> 
> https://wiki.mozilla.org/WebAPI/SimplePush#Client_.28WebApp.29_code
> 
> they show sending the pushEndpoint to the "App server",  so i think we could just use and keep it simple
> 
> it is also recommended that the channelID is never exposed to the application.
> 
> 
> On Apr 1, 2014, at 3:34 PM, Lucas Holmquist <lholmqui at redhat.com> wrote:
> 
>> i had something,  now i forgot what it was,   need to go back and check
>> On Apr 1, 2014, at 3:05 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org> wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 2:06 PM, Lucas Holmquist <lholmqui at redhat.com> wrote:
>>> still exploring
>>> 
>>> :-) any recent thoughts on 'encodeURIComponent()' ? 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> On Feb 13, 2014, at 3:39 PM, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 2:30 PM, Lucas Holmquist <lholmqui at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>> i might have a couple thoughts, but i need to try some things out first
>>>> 
>>>> Any update on that or does the solution proposed by Matzew (using  encodeURIComponent() ) could be enough ? 
>>>> 
>>>> On Feb 12, 2014, at 3:53 AM, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 7:15 PM, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Ok,
>>>>> I've been doing some tests by using the PushEndpoint as device token. For registration it works but I just faced an issue by trying to unregister because the URL for the DELETE looks like : 
>>>>> 
>>>>> https://judconpush-sblanc.rhcloud.com/rest/registry/device/https://updates.push.services.mozilla.com/update/my_personnal_psuhendpoint_id [
>>>>> 
>>>>> And the REST endpoint get a bit crazy by the extra "/" present in the endpoint URL. Therefore, I think we must just use the last URL fragment as deviceToken.
>>>>>  
>>>>> Ok answering to myself ;) That won't work neither since if we do that UPS won't have the compllete push endpoint URL. 
>>>>> So how do we deal with that ?
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 3:11 PM, Sebastien Blanc
> 
> 
> -- 
> Sent from Gmail Mobile
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20140407/37b1ea90/attachment.html 


More information about the aerogear-dev mailing list