[aerogear-dev] New release of Cordova Push Plugin ?

[Matthias Wessendorf]

On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 7:57 AM, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc at gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 6:54 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 9:52 PM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno at abstractj.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I also think that our roadmap should reflect the reality:
>>> http://staging.aerogear.org/docs/planning/roadmaps/AeroGearCordova/
>>
>>
>>
>> Not sure about the other plugins, but for push the reality is that it is
>> stable and releases are only needed on demand.
>> After 0.6.0 we had some bug-fixes, but no new features. That still
>> qualifies the original request for a 0.7.0 release, but I think it is hard
>> to 'plan' bug-fix releases.
>>
>
> But we could try to stick to the UPS roadmap.
>

sure - exception: bug / security fixes :)


> So, for instance, instead of doing a 0.7.0 release, we could give it
> version 1.0 and (if needed), release along with UPS :
>
> End of August : 1.0
>

+1 but have in mind that the native SDKs, bundle w/ the plugin, need to go
1.0.0 first ;-)


>
> (Between UPS 1.0.0 and 1.1) 1.0.X releases when needed (native SDK push
>  lib update / bug fixe on cordova parts)
>
> 1.1 : Support for other platform (ffos / Windows / Amazon ?)
>


+1 on that



>
> wdyt ?
>
>
>> -Matthias
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Erik any thoughts? Otherwise I will consider to do a full review of
>>> Cordova and
>>> take over it.
>>>
>>> On 2014-08-06, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>>> > Due to silence for quite a while, I have the impression there is no new
>>> > release of our "Cordova Push Plugin" needed :-)
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > That's fine, but please keep in mind that for the UPS 1.0.0, the
>>> versions
>>> > of the different client SDKs need to go to 1.0.0 as well
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 11:55 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <
>>> matzew at apache.org>
>>> > wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > Hi,
>>> > >
>>> > > looked at the change log of the Cordova Plugin and there were some
>>> fixes
>>> > > since the last 0.6.0 release.
>>> > >
>>> > > Before we run the Beta2 of UPS (around 6th of August, depends a bit
>>> on
>>> > > Keycloak's beta4) I'd like to get a 0.7.0 release out.
>>> > >
>>> > > Any thoughts?
>>> > >
>>> > > Thanks,
>>> > > Matthias
>>> > >
>>> > > --
>>> > > Matthias Wessendorf
>>> > >
>>> > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>> > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>> > > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Matthias Wessendorf
>>> >
>>> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>> > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>>
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > aerogear-dev mailing list
>>> > aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> abstractj
>>> PGP: 0x84DC9914
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>
>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20140808/99553dd7/attachment.html