[aerogear-dev] Call for arms -> Unified Push 1.0.0.Beta2 release bundle
Summers Pittman
supittma at redhat.com
Mon Aug 11 10:34:34 EDT 2014
On 8/11/2014 9:26 AM, Burr Sutter wrote:
>
> On Aug 11, 2014, at 7:46 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org
> <mailto:matzew at apache.org>> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 1:42 PM, Daniel
>> Bevenius<daniel.bevenius at gmail.com
>> <mailto:daniel.bevenius at gmail.com>>wrote:
>>
>> Tested aerogear-push-hellworld/cordova and found this issue:
>> * https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-push-helloworld/pull/41
>>
>> Other than that I was able to run both the Android and iOS
>> applications and receive push notifications.
>>
>> I did not have ant installed which generated an error which was
>> pretty clear, but perhaps we should add something about this
>> requirement unless it is mentioned elsewhere.
>>
>>
>> oh, right - I think it does not hurt to have 'Ant' in the
>> requirements section (install is also easy :-) -> brew install ant )
> Cordova and Android will mostly be developed on Windows machines.
>
> I assue the non-command-line user will be fine just using JBDS - many
> Windows-based developers never see a command line (DOS prompt).
>
> And for those Windows-based devs who are comfortable with an command
> line - we can specify what version of Ant they should have in their
> PATH and they should know what the PATH is.
I'll make the runs on windows and see how things go.
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 11 August 2014 12:24, Daniel
>> Bevenius<daniel.bevenius at gmail.com
>> <mailto:daniel.bevenius at gmail.com>>wrote:
>>
>> Tested aerogear-push/helloworld/andorid and was able to
>> follow the docs to setup everything and try out the
>> application and receiving notifications by using Genymotion
>> (thanks to Erik and Passos for helping me set that up).
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 11 August 2014 09:31, Daniel
>> Bevenius<daniel.bevenius at gmail.com
>> <mailto:daniel.bevenius at gmail.com>>wrote:
>>
>> Tested aerogear-push-helloworld/ios and found the
>> following minor issues:
>> * _https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-925_ "iOS
>> helloworld example contains out dated information
>> regarding sending push messages."
>> *
>> _https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear.org/pull/350_ "Minor spelling
>> corrections/suggestions"
>> Other than those I was able to follow the docs from
>> scratch and run the app and successfully received push
>> notifications.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 10 August 2014 13:48, Matthias
>> Wessendorf<matzew at apache.org
>> <mailto:matzew at apache.org>>wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 3:11 PM, Matthias
>> Wessendorf<matzew at apache.org
>> <mailto:matzew at apache.org>>wrote:
>>
>> Hi team,
>>
>> now that we have votes for the UPS and the
>> java-sender (see [1] and [2]), I'd like to start
>> testing the release bundle.
>>
>> As mentioned on IRC, the nominees for the
>> testing, are:
>> * sblanc, cvasilak, dbevenius, lholmquist, lfryc
>> and abstractj
>>
>> Besides testing the UPS and sender staging repos,
>> please test our quickstarts as well:
>> 1)https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-push-helloworld/releases/latest(1.0.0.Beta2
>> tag)
>> 2)https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-push-quickstarts
>>
>>
>> Regarding 2), please use the master branch, for
>> now. There will be a .Beta2 tag as well, once the
>> open PRs are merged (and reviewed)
>>
>>
>> Most of the PRs have been merged and reviewed. Those
>> that are open require some additional work and it's
>> perfectly fine to get them in for 1.0.0.Final.
>> Therefore here is the Beta2 release/tag
>>
>> https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-push-quickstarts/releases/tag/1.0.0.Beta2
>>
>>
>> Last but not least, please 'test' (review) the
>> documentation as well, like our guide on the
>> UnifiedPush Server:
>> http://staging.aerogear.org/docs/unifiedpush/ups_userguide/
>>
>> BTW. there is more doc on the new 'UPS doc
>> center' :-)
>> http://staging.aerogear.org/docs/unifiedpush
>>
>>
>> Hopefully, by Wednesday we have an awesome
>> 1.0.0.Beta2 and shortly after that we can go to
>> CODE_FREEZE for the 1.0.0.Final
>>
>> Any thoughts ?
>>
>> -Matthias
>>
>> PS: besides the nominated folks, others are
>> welcome to test the things as well :)
>>
>>
>> -Matthias
>>
>> [1]http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/2014-August/008710.html
>> [2]http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/2014-August/008706.html
>>
>>
>> --
>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>
>> blog:http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> sessions:http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> twitter:http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>
>> blog:http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> sessions:http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> twitter:http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> <mailto:aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>
>> blog:http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> sessions:http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> twitter:http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20140811/12819291/attachment-0001.html
More information about the aerogear-dev
mailing list